ASCP Skin Deep

COVID 2020

Issue link: https://www.ascpskindeepdigital.com/i/1235208

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 27 of 49

for the latest info, visit https://www.ascpskincare.com/updates/blog-posts/coronavirus-and-your-practice 25 6. Andrea Kitta, T he Kiss of Death: Contagion, Contamination, and Folklore (Louisville, CO: Utah State University Press, 2019), 5–7. 7. World Health Organization, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report—46 (Geneva: WHO, 2020), w w w.who.int/docs/default-source/ coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200306- sitrep-46-covid-19.pdf ?sf vrsn=96b04adf_2. 8. Paul G. Auwaerter, "Coronavirus COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)," in Johns Hopkins ABX Guide, The Johns Hopkins University (March 2020), w w w.hopkinsguides.com/hopkins/view/ Johns_Hopkins_ABX_Guide/540747/all/ Coronavirus_COVID_19_ _SARS_CoV_2_. 9. Kenji Mizumoto and Gerardo Chowell, "Estimating Risk of Death from 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease, China, January–February 2020," Emerging Infectious Diseases 26, no. 6 (June 2020), preprint accessed March 22, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2606.200233. 10. Timothy W. Russell et al., "Using a Delay- Adjusted Case-Fatality Ratio to Estimate Under-Reporting," CMMID Repositor y, March 2020, https://cmmid.github.io/topics/covid19/ severity/global_cfr_estimates.html. 11. Joseph Eisenberg, "RO: How Scientists Quantif y the Intensity of an Outbreak Like Coronavirus and Predict the Pandemic's Spread," T he Conversation, March 2020, w w w. theconversation.com/r0-how-scientists-quantif y- the-intensity-of-an-outbreak-like-coronavirus- and-predict-the-pandemics-spread-130777. 12. Robert Koch Institute, "Coronavirus Disease 2019: Daily Situation Report of the Robert Koch Institute," March 2020, w w w. rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_ Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/2020- 03-24-en.pdf ?_ _blob=publicationFile. 13. Arthur C. Macedo, Andre O. V. de Faria, and Pietro Ghezzi, "Boosting the Immune System, From Science to Myth: Analysis of the Infosphere with Google," Frontiers in Medicine, July 2019, https://doi. org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00165; Beverly Merz, "What Can You Do to Improve Your Immune System?," Har vard Health Publishing, September 2016, w w w. health.harvard.edu/healthy-eating/what-can-you- do-to-improve-your-immune-system; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, "Overview of the Immune System," Immune System Research, December 2013, w w w.niaid. nih.gov/research/immune-system-overview. 14. Paul G. Auwaerter, "Coronavirus COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)," in Johns Hopkins ABX Guide. 15. Irani Thevarajan et al., "Breadth of Concomitant Immune Responses Prior to Patient Recovery: A Case Report of Non-Severe COVID-19," Nature Medicine, March 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41591-020-0819-2; Puja Mehta et al., "COVID-19: At the beginning, I explained why it is almost impossible for human nature to accept holes in such life-changing narratives, but this may well be a valuable lesson for many communities, particularly those with healing as a vocation. The best we can do to shape those narratives into something that helps, rather than hindering the efforts being made by physicians, researchers, and the general public, is focus on developing rational coping mechanisms. It can help to understand how "noise" and subconscious patternicity hinder us from doing so, and the links in the Notes below provide many places to start. By developing rational responses, understanding the need to link these to localized narratives so that they can be better understood, finding ways to explain them to others, and strengthening our own resilience, we ensure our survival, both physical and mental. This may be the most valuable tool for healing when the time comes to emerge from self-isolation and return to healing our communities. Notes 1. World Health Organization, "Policy Statement on Data Sharing by the World Health Organization in the Context of Public Health Emergencies," World Health Organization Procedures, April 2016, https://w w w.who.int/ ihr/procedures/SPG_data_sharing.pdf. 2. Max Roser, Hannah Ritchie, and Esteban Ortiz-Ospina, "Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)—Statistics and Research," 2020, w w w.ourworldindata.org/coronavirus. 3. Jon D. Lee, An Epidemic of Rumors: How Stories Shape our Perceptions of Disease (Boulder: Utah State University Press, 2014), 2–3. 4. Michael Shermer, "Patternicity: Finding Meaningful Patterns in Meaningless Noise," Scientific American 299, no. 6 (Dec 2008): 48, https:// doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1208-48. 5. Kevin R. Foster and Hanna Kokko, "The Evolution of Superstitious and Superstition-Like Behavior," Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276, no. 1654 (September 2008): 31–37, https://doi.org/10.1098/ rspb.2008.0981; Sophie Fyfe et al., "Apophenia, Theory of Mind, and Schizotypy: Perceiving Meaning and Intentionality in Randomness," Cortex 44, no. 10 (November–December 2008): 1316– 25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.009. concludes: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." The authors make a strong case, and cite earlier studies warning of the potential for zoonotic viruses (originating in animals and jumping to humans) that provide further evidence for the way that coronaviruses have the potential to lead to outbreaks among humans. 35 Both the 2020 article and its 2015 predecessor updated in March 2020 (see note 35) pass the checks I listed earlier in the article, and sharp- eyed readers noticing that both are listed in Nature Medicine as "correspondence" rather than feature articles may be reassured that letters are fully peer- reviewed by the journal's reviewers and editors, forming a clear-cut category within that journal's editorial policy. 36 In short, not only is there no evidence to support the claim that COVID-19 is a manufactured virus, there appears to be evidence that in fact proves it is definitely natural. The sources provided go into some detail to explain and cross- check the possibilities and there seems to be no reason to believe otherwise. WHAT NEXT? As shown in the examples above, it is very easy to jump to conclusions, make assumptions based more on our own fears than on reality, and to make connections for which there is simply no evidence. Ideally, you should not take my word for this. Compare the sources against the checklist provided earlier, and use your own judgment—but attempt to avoid reading more or less into the material than is present. It is crucial to realize that precisely because this virus is new, there are still many unknowns. "No evidence" or "incomplete evidence" is not the same as "negative evidence." Unknowns are areas that need research and clarification—fewer words, not more.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of ASCP Skin Deep - COVID 2020